Da Five Bloods - Movie Review

 


Da Five Bloods was released on Netflix early in the summer of 2020 mere weeks before star Chadwick Boseman passed away from cancer. The chatter around the movie obviously changed dramatically upon the actor's death, and while Chadwick's performance should be noted and applauded, there is much more to this film that deserves mention. 

FAST FACTS
REPORTED BUDGET: $45 million
BOX OFFICE: N/A
ROTTEN TOMATOES CRITICS / AUDIENCE SCORE: 93% / 53%
CINEMA SCORE: N/A
END CREDIT SCENE: NO

NON-SPOILER REVIEW

The Spike Lee directed film features four African-American veterans of the Vietnam War who return to the Asian nation to honor a fallen friend and find a treasure they buried during the war. The movie features numerous looks at live footage and speeches from the Vietnam War time period, which can be horrifying or inspiring depending what footage happens to be on the screen at the time. 

While much of the footage is of real events and real people, the overall plot of the movie is fictional. Although the veterans portrayed were not real people, the actors were still able to convey a sense of brotherhood, struggle, and anguish that soldiers from that time period often feel. 

The strength of this film lies with the phenomenal cast: Chadwick Boseman (as Stormin' Norman), Delroy Lindo (as Paul), Clarke Peters (as Otis), Norm Lewis (as Eddie), and Isiah Whitlock Jr. (as Melvin) among others. 

OVERALL RECCOMENDATION

Parts of this movie may be off-putting to some due to the violence of the Vietnam War, or because Spike Lee's films always delve into deeper socio-political themes. I found the movie as an intriguing portrait of race, war, and psyche of soldiers that have intimately experienced the horrors of war. 

My Rating: B+

I do have some nitpicks here and there, but nothing that would force me to steer people away from this film. If you're interested in war movies, it's worth a watch. If you're interested in individual character development, it's a must watch.

SPOILER REVIEW

Most of my nitpicks come early in the movie as Spike Lee begins with shots from the late 1960s. While the clips and photos are outstanding, they go by so quickly that it is hard to fully grasp or appreciate them. That being said, I loved Lee's choice of switching camera styles as you go from present to past in flashbacks. 

As I said above, the plot follows four veterans (Paul, Otis, Melvin, Eddie) returning to Vietnam to honor their fallen squad leader (Stomin' Norman) and recover gold that they buried while fighting in the war. Because I'm watching this movie months after its initial release on Netflix and after Boseman's death, the scene early on of the four men looking at a photo of their departed friend really hits hard emotionally. 

As the men begin to explore the modern Vietnam, they learn how far the country has come since the dark days of the war, becoming modern and vibrant in the larger cities. Eventually, they have a contentious meeting with a French businessman (played by Jean Reno) who promises he can help move the buried treasure out of Vietnam if they are able to find it. Once the deal is made, then the men prepare for their journey back into the Vietnamese jungle.  

While all the men struggle with being back in a place where so many atrocities occurred, Paul has a particularly tough time. Burdened by post-traumatic-stress-disorder, he has bouts of anger, instability, and outbursts. Unfortunately for the veterans, Paul's issues only continue to worsen throughout their journey. 

Despite some truly astronomical odds, they men end up finding their treasure and the remains of their fallen leader. However, this is just the midway point of their story. Getting out of the jungle alive proves more difficult than finding a proverbial needle in a haystack. 

One of their members, Eddie, unfortunately steps onto a buried landmine after a confrontation with Paul, making everyone fully aware of the danger that Vietnam still presents in their lives as well as the horrors of such weapons. Once they believe they've exited the jungle, the men run into well-armed treasure hunters who are keen to keep the treasure at home in Vietnam. 

After a gun fight that miraculously leaves our remaining three veterans still alive, they're presented with a choice due to their car being disabled. Paul decides to hike to the nearest town (20 miles away), while the others opt for a shorter hike to nearby ruins in order to prepare for the inevitable second wave of hunters. 

On his lengthy hike, Paul descends further into madness. Spike Lee takes this opportunity to capture several monologues as the actor looks directly into the camera. Eventually, Paul stumbles, loses his treasure and supplies, gets caught by the treasure hunters, and is brutally murdered. However, just before his capture, he has a vision of Stormin' Norman. He flashes back to when Norman died, and we learn that Paul kills Norman in a spray of friendly fire while under attack. In an extremely emotional moment, the vision of Norman embraces Paul and forgives him for what he describes as "an accident." Boseman's tenderness, warmth, and charming persona adds an angelic side to the chaotic events that have taken place. 

The two surviving members of da five bloods bunker themselves in an ancient ruin and plan a last stand against the inevitable onslaught coming their way. After an intense fire fight and an unbelievable act of courage by Melvin (dove on a grenade to save Otis), Otis is the last of the bloods remaining. Finally able to leave the jungle and Vietnam with his treasure, Otis responsibly distributes his new found wealth to the family of his fallen brothers, and other worthy causes (such as an organization to remove landmines in war-torn countries and a Black Lives Matter organization). 

Da Five Bloods may indeed garner a Best Picture nomination at the Oscars, but I think the real guarantee is Delroy Lindo earning an acting nomination for playing Paul. I know Chadwick Boseman gets a lot of the headlines. Every time he is on screen he is magnetic, drawing your attention in further and further. However, I don't think he is on screen enough, or integral enough in the plot to garner any nominations. Overall, this movie will definitely be represented at many of the big awards ceremonies, and is deserving of the attention it receives. 


 




The Trial of the Chicago 7 - Movie Review




In a year where theaters have been abandoned, Netflix capitalizes by providing exquisite viewing options that have real opportunities to challenge for multiple Oscars. One of those viewing options: The Trial of the Chicago 7.

FAST FACTS
REPORTED BUDGET: $35 million
BOX OFFICE: $107,400
ROTTON TOMATOES CRITICS/AUDIENCE SCORE: 90% / 91%  
CINEMA SCORE: N/A
END CREDIT SCENE: No

NON-SPOILER REVIEW

Writer and Director Aaron Sorkin sheds light on the trial that took place following the Democratic National Convention on 1968. Located in Chicago, Illinois, the movie follows a collection of men who convened in the city to protest the government and the war in Vietnam. 

The Trial of the Chicago 7 boasts a particularly talented cast, which brings the story to life: Eddie Redmayne as Tom Hayden, Sacha Baron Cohen as Abbie Hoffman, Jeremy Strong as Jerry Rubin, John Carroll Lynch as David Dellinger, Mark Rylance as William Kunstler, and Joseph Gordon-Levitt as Richard Schultz. There is also a somewhat surprise cameo that I'll leave for the spoiler review.

The genius of Aaron Sorkin in combination with the collection of acting talent sets the stage for a wonderful movie, and it does not disappoint! Despite the seemingly mundane scene in which most of the movie takes place, I could not help but find myself riveted by such a vibrant bunch of antagonistic protagonists. 

OVERALL RECOMMENDATION 

My first reaction after finishing the movie was that I wanted to watch it again. I wanted more time with all of the characters and their personalities. They drew me in to the movie and kept me interested throughout.

My Rating: A

I think this movie is headed for Oscar recognition. I can see a best picture nomination and possibly a couple of acting nominations. Definitely worth a watch!

SPOILER REVIEW

The movie begins as each of the masterminds that will eventually be put on trial organize their resources and plans for protests in Chicago. 

To recap, the leaders and their respective organizations are: Tom Hayden and Rennie Davis (leaders of the Students for a Democratic Society), David Dellinger (leader of National Mobilization Against the War), Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin (leaders of Youth International Party), John Froines, and Lee Weiner. There was also one additional defendant named Bobby Seale (cofounder of the Black Panther Party), but Seale's case (tried separately from the rest) was declared a mistrial. 

The trial was for a conspiracy to incite violent protests and riots across state lines. The location of Chicago, the national forum of the Democratic National Convention, and the trial being a federal case due to the leaders crossing state lines put this in the spotlight of national media. 

Most of this movie takes place in the confines of a court room with occasional glimpses of the riots themselves. One might think that the setting might make the movie dull or sluggish, but I was pleasantly enthralled the entire time.

The differences between Hayden and Hoffman throughout was riveting, most of which was political or ideological banter. Also the dynamic of the two primary lawyers and the judge was fascinating (and aggravating) to watch. The chemistry and personality of all of the actors kept this story interesting and demanded my attention throughout. 

Ultimately, a star witness is called to swing the trial in the favor of the defendants. Michael Keaton plays Ramsey Clark, the formal U.S. Attorney General, who comes in to set the record straight on government involvement in this case. Based on actual events, the movie ends with small blurbs on where each defendant ended up in their lives following the trial. 

While watching this movie, one could be reminded of the protests that took place over the summer during 2020. While those protests were race related, and the protests in 1968 were (mostly) related to ending the war in Vietnam, the comparisons are there to be made. The visuals of rioting and police violence are vivid and horrifying, reminding us that this country has come a long way, but also that we still have a long way to go.